From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Psychiatry>
  4. Summary and Comment

Does Primary Care Treatment of Depression Save Money?

Researchers have found that depressed patients use more general medical services than the general population and that treating depression reduces visits to doctors for unexplained physical complaints. These investigators randomly assigned 407 high utilizers of health services (more than 7 visits per year) at 3 HMOs who met DSM-IV criteria for major depression either currently or within the past 2 years with current partial remission, to usual medical care with the opportunity for depression treatment or to usual care plus a comprehensive depression-management program. The comprehensive program included assessments, psychoeducation, regular follow-ups by primary care physicians and research assistants, and, usually, treatment with therapeutic doses of sertraline or nortriptyline. Number of depression-free days, measured with a standardized rating scale, and cost of care were evaluated regularly for 12 months.

Depression-management patients were about 3 times as likely as treatment-as-usual patients to receive and to continue antidepressant treatment and averaged 47 more depression-free days. Depression-management patients averaged $1974 more in health service costs per year than usual-care patients, mostly because of antidepressants ($412), monitoring by study coordinators, occasional psychiatric hospitalizations, and additional checkups by physicians. As a result, each additional depression-free day in the depression-management group cost $41.34.

Comment: Treatment of depression by primary care practitioners was effective in this study, but overall reductions in healthcare utilization did not offset the additional cost of adequate depression treatment. If this finding is reliable, society will have to decide whether the benefits of not being depressed, which probably include improved work productivity and quality of life, are worth a cost that seems rather modest, when compared with the price of other common medical interventions.

— S Dubovsky

Published in Journal Watch Psychiatry March 6, 2001

Citation(s):

Simon GE et al. Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001 Feb 58 181-187.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2001. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.