Preventing Depression in Adolescents

Home>
Specialties>
Psychiatry>
Summary and Comment

Preventing Depression in Adolescents

Given the high rates of suicidality and impaired social functioning associated with adolescent depression, preventive interventions are important. In investigating a depression prevention program for teenagers, these investigators took into account 2 known risk factors for adolescent depression -- family history of depression and current depressive symptoms. The researchers identified 2995 depressed parents and their 3374 adolescent offspring (age range, 13 to 18) from an HMO's patient records and then identified 94 of the teenagers as having subsyndromal depression. These patients underwent comprehensive assessment batteries before random assignment to either usual care or 15 one-hour group sessions of cognitive therapy. Teenagers in the cognitive-therapy group attended a mean of 9 sessions. All participants were then followed for 2 years, with annual reassessments. Nine teenagers were not assessed at 1 year; 16 were not assessed at 2 years.

Compared with usual care, cognitive therapy was associated with significantly better scores on both depression and global functioning measures and with significantly fewer episodes of depression during the 2-year follow-up. The positive effects of the intervention diminished, but did not disappear, by the last follow-up.

Comment: The authors acknowledged that few participants were identified for the study, despite wide screening of HMO records. Even with this limitation, these results strongly support continued research on effective preventive methods. The diminished differences between the cognitive-therapy and usual-care groups by 2 years argue for approaches that use "booster" sessions.

— Barbara Geller, MD

Published in Journal Watch Psychiatry January 9, 2002

Citation(s):

Clarke GN et al. A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001 Dec; 58:1127-34.

Original article (Subscription may be required)
Medline abstract (Free)

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. We ask that you keep your remarks to a reasonable length, and we reserve the right to withhold publication of remarks that do not meet this standard.

The editors of Journal Watch may respond to Reader Remarks, but we cannot promise to respond to a particular remark.

Remark subject:*

Your remark:*

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:
First & middle initial:*

Last:*

Email address (will not
be published):*

Professional specialty:*

Place of work (optional):

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

No competing interests

Or, the following competing interests (for example, financial stakes or professional relationships):

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.