From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Psychiatry>
  4. Summary and Comment

Sildenafil and Antidepressant-Associated Sexual Dysfunction

Sexual functioning in at least half of these SRI-treated patients improved with sildenafil treatment.

Sexual dysfunction associated with the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) has been reported in 30% to 70% of treated patients and is a significant contributor to discontinuation of these medications. In a multicenter, university-based, double-blind, prospective study that was funded by the manufacturer of sildenafil, 90 antidepressant-treated men with sexual dysfunction and remitted depression were randomized to receive 6 weeks of treatment with sildenafil (50 to 100 mg) or placebo (mean age, 45; duration of antidepressant use, 27 months). Sexual dysfunction was defined as erectile problems, delayed ejaculation, or lack of orgasm. Most patients were taking an SSRI.

On standardized rating scales, significantly more sildenafil recipients than placebo recipients showed marked improvement in sexual function (55% vs. 4%); however, sildenafil had little effect on sexual desire. In both groups, scores on depression scales remained consistent with remission. Other than headache (reported by 40% of sildenafil recipients) and flushing (17%), few adverse effects were noted.

Comment: This patient group was highly selected: All participants were healthy, had no medical conditions that could impair sexual function, and had no sexual dysfunction prior to antidepressant treatment. Nevertheless, these results indicate that sexual dysfunction in at least half of these SRI-treated patients improved with sildenafil treatment.

— Gary Tucker, MD

Published in Journal Watch Psychiatry February 5, 2003

Citation(s):

Nurnberg HG et al. Treatment of antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction with sildenafil: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003 Jan 1; 289:56-64.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2003. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.