From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Psychiatry>
  4. Summary and Comment

Computer Psychotherapy in Primary Care Comes of Age: Benefits for Depression and Anxiety

Both financial and clinical benefits may accrue from providing computerized CBT to primary care patients with mixed depression and anxiety diagnoses.

Although primary care patients with depression and anxiety seem to prefer psychotherapy to medication, they may have limited access to this type of treatment due to the lack of therapists trained in evidence-based treatments. To learn more about the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression and anxiety, these British researchers randomized 274 patients to 9 weeks of computerized CBT or to usual primary care (which could include psychotherapy referrals). Primary-care physicians could prescribe pharmacotherapy to all patients. Patients had diagnoses of depression or anxiety disorders (panic or social or specific phobias) or had mixed diagnoses.

One third of eligible patients declined to participate in the protocol; 27% of CBT recipients dropped out by the first post-treatment assessment. Over 6 months of follow-up, computerized CBT showed sustained and significantly superior effects on depression levels and on work and social functioning, as well as high patient satisfaction. On anxiety measures, effects were significant only with severe illness. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the intervention group had higher service costs but lower costs from lost employment. If a one-unit improvement on the Beck Depression Inventory was modestly valued at 40 pounds sterling (around US$73), the intervention was shown to have a high probability (81%) of being cost-effective.

Comment: These intriguing studies document significant benefits of computerized CBT among typical primary care patients with depression and anxiety. The results are limited by the exclusive reliance on patient self-reports for outcomes; the inability to blind the treatments; and the high refusal and dropout rates, which raise doubts about the acceptability of this treatment. Perhaps, allowing therapists time to increase patient engagement and provide further individual tailoring of the treatment could improve acceptability while restraining costs.

— Peter Roy-Byrne, MD

Published in Journal Watch Psychiatry August 19, 2004

Citation(s):

Proudfoot J et al. Clinical efficacy of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004 Jul; 185:46-54.

McCrone P et al. Cost-effectiveness of computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: Randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2004 Jul; 185:55-62.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2004. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.