From the publishers of The New England Journal of Medicine

Save time and stay informed. Our physician-editors offer you clinical perspectives on key research and news.

  1. Home>
  2. Specialties>
  3. Psychiatry>
  4. Feature

Emerging Perspectives: Does VNS Work in Refractory Depression?

Three studies provide inconclusive evidence.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), used to treat epilepsy since 1997, received FDA approval as an adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Three multicenter studies, supported by the manufacturer of the implantable VNS device and conducted by the same research team, have now examined the device’s short- and longer-term efficacy in a group of 222 patients with clearly refractory depression (current episodes had failed to respond to 2–6 adequate trials of treatment, including ECT in one third of patients). All patients underwent surgery for device implantation.

All patients had experienced at least four lifetime depression episodes, or the current episode had lasted at least 2 years (average illness duration, 25.5 years). About 10% of patients had bipolar disorder.

In the first study, the primary outcome measure was response on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (defined as ≥50% improvement in scores). Patients were randomized to 10 weeks of active or sham VNS (the device was turned off for sham VNS) added to multiple medications that patients were already taking. Between-group differences in HRSD response rates were not significant.

In the second study, 205 of the patients were treated openly with active VNS for another 9 months (i.e., the stimulator was turned on in all patients). The primary outcome measure was the change in HRSD scores. Scores progressively decreased to a statistically significant degree over the year of follow-up (mean decrease, 26%). Fifty-five patients responded (27%), and 32 remitted (15%); findings were similar on some secondary measures. Most responders had a sustained response (≥50% improvement at one monthly visit and ≥40% improvement at two others within the last 3 months of the study). Still, 30 patients deteriorated, and 7 attempted suicide (3 for the first time).

In the third study, the researchers compared reductions in patients’ scores on a secondary measure with those among 124 treatment-as-usual (TAU) patients with similar levels of depression enrolled in a naturalistic study of healthcare costs at some of the same centers. At 12 months, the VNS group had significantly greater score reductions than did the TAU group (23% vs. 11%). HRSD score reductions were similar (29% vs. 18%). The HRSD response rate with VNS was double the rate with TAU.

Comment: Although adjunctive VNS is not particularly effective acutely, response might increase with continued treatment. Despite the second study’s statistically significant results, these studies have some drawbacks. Average reductions in depression scores and response/remission rates were mediocre, corrections were not made for multiple comparisons, the definition of sustained response would not satisfy many patients, subjects from different studies were compared, and open treatment was used without control groups.

A few patients who have not responded to other treatments might benefit from VNS. However, clinicians should avoid exposing large numbers of patients to this expensive treatment which requires surgical implantation — especially because many will not do well. We need additional research to determine specific predictors of benefit, any overlap between ECT nonresponse and VNS nonresponse, and any meaningful improvement in functioning.

— Steven Dubovsky, MD

Published in Journal Watch Psychiatry November 2, 2005

Citation(s):

Rush AJ et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A randomized, controlled acute phase trial. Biol Psychiatry 2005 Sep 1; 58:347-54.

Rush AJ et al. Effects of 12 months of vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: A naturalistic study. Biol Psychiatry 2005 Sep 1; 58:355-63.

George MS et al. A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2005 Sep 1; 58:364-73.

Your Remark:

Reader Remarks are intended to encourage lively discussion of clinical topics with your peers in the medical community. Please consider this when composing your remark.

Fields marked with an * are required.

Name as you'd like it to appear:

Submitting a comment indicates you have read and agreed to the remark guidelines and declare:*

PRIVACY: We will not use your email address, submitted for a comment, for any other purpose nor sell, rent, or share your e-mail address with any third parties. Please see our Privacy Policy.

 

CLEAR erases anything you've added in any part of the form. CONTINUE allows you to check your entire post (and edit it if necessary) before submitting.

To ensure that your Reader Remark is not formatted as one long paragraph, precede new paragraphs with either a blank line or an indentation.

Search

Advanced

Article Tools

Reader Remarks

Sign-In

Forgot your password?

New to Journal Watch?

E-mail Alerts

Delivered to your inbox.
Tailored to your interests. Free.

Sign Up Now!

Journal Watch Newsletters

Available in 13 specialties with convenient delivery and 10 free online CME exams.

Subscribe Now!

Copyright © 2005. Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.